↓ Skip to main content

Expert systems for chemical analysis (ESPRIT Project 1570)

Overview of attention for article published in Chromatographia, December 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Expert systems for chemical analysis (ESPRIT Project 1570)
Published in
Chromatographia, December 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02268159
Authors

D. Goulder, T. Blaffert, A. Blokland, L. Buydens, A. Chhabra, A. Cleland, N. Dunand, H. Hindriks, G. Kateman, H. van Leeuwen, D. Massart, A. Mulholland, G. Musch, P. Naish, A. Peeters, G. Postma, P. Schoenmakers, M. de Smet, B. Vandeginste, J. Vink

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 5 56%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 56%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 1991.
All research outputs
#7,556,753
of 23,050,116 outputs
Outputs from Chromatographia
#138
of 1,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,322
of 54,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromatographia
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,050,116 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,028 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.