↓ Skip to main content

How to choose cationics for fabric softeners

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society (JAOCS), June 1983
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
How to choose cationics for fabric softeners
Published in
Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society (JAOCS), June 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf02671352
Authors

Jeannene A. Ackerman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,798,611
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society (JAOCS)
#122
of 3,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#484
of 7,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society (JAOCS)
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.