↓ Skip to main content

Luminescence from non-bioluminescent tissues in oceanic cephalopods

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, July 1979
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Luminescence from non-bioluminescent tissues in oceanic cephalopods
Published in
Marine Biology, July 1979
DOI 10.1007/bf00386530
Authors

R. E. Young, C. F. E. Roper, K. Mangold, G. Leisman, F. G. Hochberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 7%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Student > Bachelor 7 26%
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 56%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,239
of 3,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,422
of 5,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them