↓ Skip to main content

Vacuum sealing: indication, technique, and results

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, December 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
93 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Vacuum sealing: indication, technique, and results
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, December 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf02716212
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Fleischmann, U. Becker, M. Bischoff, H. Hoekstra

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Materials Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#88
of 957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,733
of 79,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 957 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them