↓ Skip to main content

Optimum binary search trees

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Informatica, March 1971
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 164)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
292 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Optimum binary search trees
Published in
Acta Informatica, March 1971
DOI 10.1007/bf00264289
Authors

D. E. Knuth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Master 8 20%
Professor 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 17 43%
Engineering 7 18%
Mathematics 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Materials Science 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Acta Informatica
#25
of 164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#625
of 3,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Informatica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them