↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Efficacy of Antidepressants

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Comparative Efficacy of Antidepressants
Published in
Drugs, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00003495-199200432-00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Kasper, J. Fuger, H.-J. Möller

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Psychology 7 11%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#536
of 3,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,794
of 285,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#75
of 931 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 931 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.