| Title |
Logical Gene Ontology Annotations (GOAL): exploring gene ontology annotations with OWL
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Semantics, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2041-1480-3-s1-s3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Jupp, Robert Stevens, Robert Hoehndorf |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 44% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 22% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#145
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,035
of 163,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.