↓ Skip to main content

Tree mortality from drought, insects, and their interactions in a changing climate

Overview of attention for article published in New Phytologist, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
617 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
989 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tree mortality from drought, insects, and their interactions in a changing climate
Published in
New Phytologist, June 2015
DOI 10.1111/nph.13477
Pubmed ID
Authors

William R L Anderegg, Jeffrey A Hicke, Rosie A Fisher, Craig D Allen, Juliann Aukema, Barbara Bentz, Sharon Hood, Jeremy W Lichstein, Alison K Macalady, Nate McDowell, Yude Pan, Kenneth Raffa, Anna Sala, John D Shaw, Nathan L Stephenson, Christina Tague, Melanie Zeppel

Abstract

Climate change is expected to drive increased tree mortality through drought, heat stress, and insect attacks, with manifold impacts on forest ecosystems. Yet, climate-induced tree mortality and biotic disturbance agents are largely absent from process-based ecosystem models. Using data sets from the western USA and associated studies, we present a framework for determining the relative contribution of drought stress, insect attack, and their interactions, which is critical for modeling mortality in future climates. We outline a simple approach that identifies the mechanisms associated with two guilds of insects - bark beetles and defoliators - which are responsible for substantial tree mortality. We then discuss cross-biome patterns of insect-driven tree mortality and draw upon available evidence contrasting the prevalence of insect outbreaks in temperate and tropical regions. We conclude with an overview of tools and promising avenues to address major challenges. Ultimately, a multitrophic approach that captures tree physiology, insect populations, and tree-insect interactions will better inform projections of forest ecosystem responses to climate change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 178 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 989 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 964 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 212 21%
Researcher 193 20%
Student > Master 136 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 70 7%
Student > Bachelor 67 7%
Other 118 12%
Unknown 193 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 309 31%
Environmental Science 295 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 63 6%
Engineering 16 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 <1%
Other 45 5%
Unknown 252 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#234,854
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#69
of 9,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,358
of 280,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#1
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.