| Title |
Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic hernias: transabdominal partial extraperitoneal (TAPE) technique
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-010-1513-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anil Sharma, Ashish Dey, Rajesh Khullar, Vandana Soni, Manish Baijal, Pradeep K. Chowbey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 23% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 26% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 55% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,684
of 6,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,611
of 181,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.