| Title |
In vitro propagation and assessment of clonal fidelity of Nepenthes khasiana Hook. f.: a medicinal insectivorous plant of India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11738-013-1314-x |
| Authors |
Soibam Purnima Devi, Suman Kumaria, Satyawada Rama Rao, Pramod Tandon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,731,085
of 23,500,709 outputs
Outputs from Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
#53
of 319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,012
of 199,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,500,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 319 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them