↓ Skip to main content

PCR based molecular characterization of Nepenthes khasiana Hook. f.—pitcher plant

Overview of attention for article published in Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
PCR based molecular characterization of Nepenthes khasiana Hook. f.—pitcher plant
Published in
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10722-009-9444-0
Authors

B. S. Bhau, K. Medhi, T. Sarkar, S. P. Saikia

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Costa Rica 1 2%
Unknown 58 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 24%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 58%
Environmental Science 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,746,777
of 23,555,482 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#284
of 734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,128
of 112,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,555,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.