| Title |
Control of pore size distribution of silica gel through sol-gel process using inorganic salts and surfactants as additives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, March 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00542919 |
| Authors |
Tadahiro Murakata, Shimio Sato, Takashi Ohgawara, Tetushi Watanabe, Tohru Suzuki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 25% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 10 | 36% |
| Engineering | 5 | 18% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2010.
All research outputs
#4,967,738
of 23,802,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#305
of 4,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,247
of 19,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,802,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,722 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.