You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Inadmissibility of What We Eat in America and NHANES Dietary Data in Nutrition and Obesity Research and the Scientific Formulation of National Dietary Guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mayo Clinic Proceedings, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.04.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward Archer, Gregory Pavela, Carl J. Lavie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 267 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 80 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 28 | 10% |
| Spain | 9 | 3% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Argentina | 4 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Unknown | 106 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 180 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 48 | 18% |
| Scientists | 33 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 283 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 14% |
| Researcher | 40 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 12% |
| Other | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 71 | 24% |
| Unknown | 57 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 15% |
| Unknown | 75 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 563. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#43,101
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Mayo Clinic Proceedings
#49
of 5,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#368
of 280,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mayo Clinic Proceedings
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.