↓ Skip to main content

Biotransformation of benzaldehyde into (R)-phenylacetylcarbinol by filamentous fungi or their extracts

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Biotransformation of benzaldehyde into (R)-phenylacetylcarbinol by filamentous fungi or their extracts
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, October 2001
DOI 10.1007/s002530100781
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Rosche, V. Sandford, M. Breuer, B. Hauer, P. Rogers

Abstract

Extracts of 14 filamentous fungi were examined regarding their potential for production of (R)-phenylacetylcarbinol [(R)-PAC], which is the chiral precursor in the manufacture of the pharmaceuticals ephedrine and pseudoephedrine. Benzaldehyde and pyruvate were transformed at a scale of 1.2 ml into PAC by cell-free extracts of all selected strains, covering the broad taxonomic spectrum of Ascomycota, Zygomycota and Basidiomycota. Highest final PAC concentrations were obtained with the extracts of Rhizopus javanicus and Fusarium sp. [78-84 mM (11.7-12.6 g/l) PAC within 20 h from initial substrate concentrations of 100 mM benzaldehyde and 150 mM pyruvate]. (R)-PAC was in about 90-93% enantiomeric excess. Rhizopus javanicus had the advantage of faster growth than Fusarium sp. Rhizopus javanicus mycelia were used as an example in a biotransformation process based on whole cells and benzaldehyde and glucose as substrates. The substrate pyruvate was generated through the fungal fermentation of glucose. Only 19 mM PAC (2.9 g/l) were produced within 8 h from 80 mM benzaldehyde. with evidence of significant benzyl alcohol production.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
Germany 2 4%
Unknown 42 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 4 9%
Lecturer 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 28%
Chemistry 13 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Engineering 3 7%
Chemical Engineering 2 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2013.
All research outputs
#5,089,278
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1,221
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,081
of 43,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#10
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.