↓ Skip to main content

Postnatal Age Is a Critical Determinant of the Neonatal Host Response to Sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Postnatal Age Is a Critical Determinant of the Neonatal Host Response to Sepsis
Published in
Molecular Medicine, June 2015
DOI 10.2119/molmed.2015.00064
Pubmed ID
Authors

James L. Wynn, Scott O. Guthrie, Hector R. Wong, Patrick Lahni, Ricardo Ungaro, M. Cecilia Lopez, Henry V. Baker, Lyle L. Moldawer

Abstract

Neonates manifest a unique host response to sepsis even among other children. Preterm neonates may experience sepsis soon after birth or during often protracted birth hospitalizations as they attain physiologic maturity. We examined the transcriptome using genome-wide expression profiling on prospectively collected peripheral blood samples from infants evaluated for sepsis within 24 hours after clinical presentation. Simultaneous plasma samples were examined for alterations in inflammatory mediators. Group designation (sepsis or uninfected) was determined retrospectively based on clinical exam and laboratory results over the next 72 hours from the time of evaluation. Unsupervised analysis showed the major node of separation between groups was timing of sepsis episode relative to birth (early, <3 days or late, ≥3 days). Principal component analyses revealed significant differences between patients with early or late sepsis despite the presence of similar key immunologic pathway aberrations in both groups. Unique to neonates, the uninfected state and host response to sepsis is significantly affected by timing relative to birth. Future therapeutic approaches may need to be tailored to the timing of the infectious event based on post-natal age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 15 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 20 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2015.
All research outputs
#14,717,512
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#792
of 1,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,809
of 269,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.