↓ Skip to main content

Chromatographic analysis and tissue distribution of radiocopper-labelled haematoporphyrin derivatives

Overview of attention for article published in Lasers in Medical Science, March 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Chromatographic analysis and tissue distribution of radiocopper-labelled haematoporphyrin derivatives
Published in
Lasers in Medical Science, March 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02593792
Authors

Brian C. Wilson, Gunter Firnau, W. Patrick Jeeves, Kay L. Brown, Diane M. Burns-McCormick

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2006.
All research outputs
#7,556,753
of 23,050,116 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#284
of 1,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,694
of 13,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,050,116 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them