↓ Skip to main content

Nepenthes group Montanae (Nepenthaceae) in Indo-China, with N. thai and N. bokor described as new

Overview of attention for article published in Kew Bulletin, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
22 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Nepenthes group Montanae (Nepenthaceae) in Indo-China, with N. thai and N. bokor described as new
Published in
Kew Bulletin, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12225-009-9117-3
Authors

Martin Cheek, Matthew Jebb

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 39%
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 61%
Environmental Science 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,650,357
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Kew Bulletin
#263
of 1,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,714
of 111,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kew Bulletin
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them