↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update)

Overview of attention for article published in Documenta Ophthalmologica, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update)
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10633-015-9504-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daphne L. McCulloch, Michael F. Marmor, Mitchell G. Brigell, Ruth Hamilton, Graham E. Holder, Radouil Tzekov, Michael Bach

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 33%
Researcher 4 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,278,422
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#366
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,736
of 266,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.