↓ Skip to main content

Real time tissue elasticity imaging using the combined autocorrelation method

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 184)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
24 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Real time tissue elasticity imaging using the combined autocorrelation method
Published in
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, September 2002
DOI 10.1007/bf02481234
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tsuyoshi Shiina, Naotaka Nitta, Ei Ueno, Jeffrey C. Bamber

Abstract

The elastic properties of tissues are expected to provide novel information for use in diagnosing pathologic changes in tissues and discriminating between malignant and benign tumors. Because it is hard to directly estimate the elastic modulus distribution from echo signals, methods for imaging the distribution of tissue strain under static compression are being widely investigated. Imaging the distribution of strain has proven to be useful for detecting disease tissues on the basis of their differences in elastic properties, although it is more qualitative than elastic modulus distribution. Many approaches to obtaining strain images from echo signals have been proposed. Most of these approaches use the spatial correlation technique, a method of detecting tissue displacement that provides maximum correlation between the echo signal obtained before and the one obtained after compression. Those methods are not suited for real-time processing, however, because of the amount of computation time they require. An alternative approach is a phase-tracking method, which is analogous to Doppler blood flowmetry. Although it can realize the rapid detection of displacement, the aliasing effect prevents its application to the large displacements that are necessary to improve the S/N ratio of the strain image. We therefore developed a more useful technique for imaging tissue elasticity. This approach, which we call the combined autocorrelation (CA) method, has the advantages of producing strain images of high quality with real-time processing and being applicable to large displacements.Numeric simulation and phantom experimentation have demonstrated that this method's capability to reconstruct images of tissue strain distribution under practical conditions is superior to that of the conventional spatial correlation method. In simulation and phantom experimentation, moreover, the image of elastic modulus distribution was also obtained by estimating stress distribution using a three-dimensional tissue model. When the proposed CA method was used to measure breast tumor specimens, the obtained strain images clearly revealed harder tumor lesions that were only vaguely resolved in B-mode images. Moreover, the results indicated the possibility of extracting the pathological characteristics of a tumor, making it useful for determining tumor type. These advantages justify the clinical use of the CA method.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 2 3%
Denmark 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 55 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 25%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 8 14%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 21 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 22%
Physics and Astronomy 5 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,841,315
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ultrasonics
#11
of 184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,728
of 46,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ultrasonics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them