↓ Skip to main content

Procedural CAD Model Edge Tolerance Negotiation for Surface Meshing

Overview of attention for article published in Engineering with Computers, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 206)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Procedural CAD Model Edge Tolerance Negotiation for Surface Meshing
Published in
Engineering with Computers, October 2001
DOI 10.1007/pl00013392
Authors

J. P. Steinbrenner, N. J. Wyman, J. R. Chawner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2010.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Engineering with Computers
#38
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,239
of 44,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Engineering with Computers
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.