| Title |
Imaging Needs in Novel Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.029 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edgard A. Prihadi, Victoria Delgado, Rebecca T. Hahn, Jonathon Leipsic, James K. Min, Jeroen J. Bax |
| Abstract |
The advent of novel transcatheter therapies for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has attracted much attention. Novel 3-dimensional imaging techniques have permitted analysis of the tricuspid valve (TV) anatomy from unparalleled views and better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of TR. Grading TR and assessment of right ventricular function remain challenging, and although 2-dimensional echocardiography is the mainstay imaging technique to evaluate patients with severe TR the use of 3-dimensional echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance is increasing. The number of transcatheter interventions for TR is growing, and procedural success relies significantly on the pre-procedural evaluation of the anatomy of the TV, etiology and severity of TR, right ventricular size and function, and importantly, the anatomic relationships of the TV. The role of multimodality imaging in patient selection and procedural planning for transcatheter TV repair is reviewed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 20% |
| Spain | 10 | 11% |
| Mexico | 8 | 9% |
| Argentina | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Paraguay | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 9% |
| Scientists | 6 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 50% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 33 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#755,031
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#195
of 2,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,524
of 340,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#6
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.