You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantitative Disease Resistance and Quantitative Resistance Loci in Breeding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annual Review of Phytopathology, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081904 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dina A St Clair |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| India | 5 | 1% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Senegal | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 399 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 95 | 22% |
| Researcher | 89 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 64 | 15% |
| Unknown | 65 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 292 | 69% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | <1% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Unknown | 69 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,864,061
of 23,383,275 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Phytopathology
#105
of 709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,973
of 95,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Phytopathology
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,383,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.