| Title |
Comparison of 0.1% Bromfenac Sodium and 0.1% Pemirolast Potassium for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, November 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10384-004-0127-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Minori Miyake-Kashima, Yoji Takano, Mari Tanaka, Yoshiyuki Satake, Tetsuya Kawakita, Murat Dogru, Naoko Asano-Kato, Kazumi Fukagawa, Hiroshi Fujishima |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 38% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 23% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2012.
All research outputs
#3,319,745
of 23,051,185 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#10
of 494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,858
of 62,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,051,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 494 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them