| Title |
Fluorinated amino acids for tumour imaging with positron emission tomography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00259-001-0716-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Laverman, Otto C. Boerman, Frans H. Corstens, Wim J. Oyen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 19 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Engineering | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,463,623
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#382
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,037
of 126,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.