| Title |
Phylogeny and evolution of plant pathogenic oomycetes—a global overview
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plant Pathology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10658-013-0366-5 |
| Authors |
Marco Thines |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 23% |
| Researcher | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 54 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 142 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 61 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#316
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,849
of 305,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.