↓ Skip to main content

Competitive interactions and resource partitioning between northern spotted owls and barred owls in western Oregon

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Monographs, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Competitive interactions and resource partitioning between northern spotted owls and barred owls in western Oregon
Published in
Wildlife Monographs, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/wmon.1009
Authors

J. David Wiens, Robert G. Anthony, Eric D. Forsman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Unknown 158 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 18%
Student > Bachelor 30 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 48%
Environmental Science 32 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 36 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,626,419
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Monographs
#19
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,446
of 228,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Monographs
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one scored the same or higher as 27 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them