↓ Skip to main content

Variants in MTNR1B influence fasting glucose levels

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
646 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
396 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variants in MTNR1B influence fasting glucose levels
Published in
Nature Genetics, December 2008
DOI 10.1038/ng.290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inga Prokopenko, Claudia Langenberg, Jose C Florez, Richa Saxena, Nicole Soranzo, Gudmar Thorleifsson, Ruth J F Loos, Alisa K Manning, Anne U Jackson, Yurii Aulchenko, Simon C Potter, Michael R Erdos, Serena Sanna, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Eleanor Wheeler, Marika Kaakinen, Valeriya Lyssenko, Wei-Min Chen, Kourosh Ahmadi, Jacques S Beckmann, Richard N Bergman, Murielle Bochud, Lori L Bonnycastle, Thomas A Buchanan, Antonio Cao, Alessandra Cervino, Lachlan Coin, Francis S Collins, Laura Crisponi, Eco J C de Geus, Abbas Dehghan, Panos Deloukas, Alex S F Doney, Paul Elliott, Nelson Freimer, Vesela Gateva, Christian Herder, Albert Hofman, Thomas E Hughes, Sarah Hunt, Thomas Illig, Michael Inouye, Bo Isomaa, Toby Johnson, Augustine Kong, Maria Krestyaninova, Johanna Kuusisto, Markku Laakso, Noha Lim, Ulf Lindblad, Cecilia M Lindgren, Owen T McCann, Karen L Mohlke, Andrew D Morris, Silvia Naitza, Marco Orrù, Colin N A Palmer, Anneli Pouta, Joshua Randall, Wolfgang Rathmann, Jouko Saramies, Paul Scheet, Laura J Scott, Angelo Scuteri, Stephen Sharp, Eric Sijbrands, Jan H Smit, Kijoung Song, Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir, Heather M Stringham, Tiinamaija Tuomi, Jaakko Tuomilehto, André G Uitterlinden, Benjamin F Voight, Dawn Waterworth, H-Erich Wichmann, Gonneke Willemsen, Jacqueline C M Witteman, Xin Yuan, Jing Hua Zhao, Eleftheria Zeggini, David Schlessinger, Manjinder Sandhu, Dorret I Boomsma, Manuela Uda, Tim D Spector, Brenda WJH Penninx, David Altshuler, Peter Vollenweider, Marjo Riitta Jarvelin, Edward Lakatta, Gerard Waeber, Caroline S Fox, Leena Peltonen, Leif C Groop, Vincent Mooser, L Adrienne Cupples, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Michael Boehnke, Inês Barroso, Cornelia Van Duijn, Josée Dupuis, Richard M Watanabe, Kari Stefansson, Mark I McCarthy, Nicholas J Wareham, James B Meigs, Gonçalo R Abecasis

Abstract

To identify previously unknown genetic loci associated with fasting glucose concentrations, we examined the leading association signals in ten genome-wide association scans involving a total of 36,610 individuals of European descent. Variants in the gene encoding melatonin receptor 1B (MTNR1B) were consistently associated with fasting glucose across all ten studies. The strongest signal was observed at rs10830963, where each G allele (frequency 0.30 in HapMap CEU) was associated with an increase of 0.07 (95% CI = 0.06-0.08) mmol/l in fasting glucose levels (P = 3.2 x 10(-50)) and reduced beta-cell function as measured by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-B, P = 1.1 x 10(-15)). The same allele was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (odds ratio = 1.09 (1.05-1.12), per G allele P = 3.3 x 10(-7)) in a meta-analysis of 13 case-control studies totaling 18,236 cases and 64,453 controls. Our analyses also confirm previous associations of fasting glucose with variants at the G6PC2 (rs560887, P = 1.1 x 10(-57)) and GCK (rs4607517, P = 1.0 x 10(-25)) loci.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 382 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 19%
Researcher 72 18%
Professor 37 9%
Lecturer 28 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 25 6%
Other 93 23%
Unknown 65 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 68 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 7%
Neuroscience 9 2%
Other 53 13%
Unknown 75 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,102,242
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#2,797
of 7,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,778
of 184,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#24
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.