| Title |
Meat ants as dominant members of Australian ant communities: an experimental test of their influence on the foraging success and forager abundance of other species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, June 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00326085 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. N. Andersen, A. D. Patel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| French Guiana | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 19% |
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 12% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,112,293
of 24,340,143 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,759
of 4,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,879
of 23,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,340,143 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.