| Title |
Effect of culture conditions on growth of green alga — Haematococcus pluvialis and astaxanthin production
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, September 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11738-002-0058-9 |
| Authors |
Usha Tripathi, R. Sarada, G. A. Ravishankar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 24% |
| Engineering | 9 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2010.
All research outputs
#7,557,046
of 23,051,185 outputs
Outputs from Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
#51
of 312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,468
of 45,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,051,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 312 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them