| Title |
Epidermolysis bullosa hereditaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00112-007-1663-x |
| Authors |
M. Laimer, C.M. Lanschützer, E. Nischler, A. Klausegger, A. Diem, G. Pohla-Gubo, J.W. Bauer, H. Hintner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 25% |
| Psychology | 4 | 20% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2010.
All research outputs
#4,764,468
of 23,051,185 outputs
Outputs from Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde
#42
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,400
of 157,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,051,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them