| Title |
Ishango revisited: new age determinations and cultural interpretations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
African Archaeological Review, December 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01117083 |
| Authors |
Alison S. Brooks, Catherine C. Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Professor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 24% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 15% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 26% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,738,328
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from African Archaeological Review
#48
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,147
of 49,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Archaeological Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them