Title |
Functional recovery after human umbilical cord blood cells transplantation with brain-derived neutrophic factor into the spinal cord injured rat
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Neurochirurgica, July 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00701-005-0538-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S.-U. Kuh, Y.-E. Cho, D.-H. Yoon, K.-N. Kim, Y. Ha |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,764,468
of 23,051,185 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#279
of 1,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,564
of 57,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,051,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,935 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them