You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Group identity, social distance and intergroup bias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Economic Psychology, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.joep.2007.01.007 |
| Authors |
Ali M. Ahmed |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 49 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 18% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 31 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 25 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,415,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Economic Psychology
#238
of 999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,556
of 82,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Economic Psychology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.