| Title |
Cytochrome P450-dependent fatty acid hydroxylases in plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytochemistry Reviews, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11101-006-9041-1 |
| Authors |
S. Kandel, V. Sauveplane, A. Olry, L. Diss, I. Benveniste, F. Pinot |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2012.
All research outputs
#4,764,468
of 23,051,185 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#71
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,484
of 68,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,051,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.