You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New horizons for future research – Critical issues to consider for maximizing research excellence and impact
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Metabolism, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.05.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wolfgang Langhans, Roger Adan, Myrtha Arnold, William A. Banks, J. Patrick Card, Megan J. Dailey, Derek Daniels, Annette D. de Kloet, Guillaume de Lartigue, Suzanne Dickson, Shahana Fedele, Harvey J. Grill, John-Olov Jansson, Sharon Kaufman, Grant Kolar, Eric Krause, Shin J. Lee, Christelle Le Foll, Barry E. Levin, Thomas A. Lutz, Abdelhak Mansouri, Timothy H. Moran, Gustavo Pacheco-López, Deepti Ramachandran, Helen Raybould, Linda Rinaman, Willis K. Samson, Graciela Sanchez-Watts, Randy J. Seeley, Karolina P. Skibicka, Dana Small, Alan C. Spector, Kellie L. Tamashiro, Brian Templeton, Stefan Trapp, Patrick Tso, Alan G. Watts, Nadja Weissfeld, Diana Williams, Christian Wolfrum, Gina Yosten, Stephen C. Woods |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Qatar | 1 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 20% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,708,457
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Metabolism
#699
of 1,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,172
of 339,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Metabolism
#28
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.