| Title |
3D reconstruction of the human rib cage from 2D projection images using a statistical shape model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11548-009-0390-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jalda Dworzak, Hans Lamecker, Jens von Berg, Tobias Klinder, Cristian Lorenz, Dagmar Kainmüller, Heiko Seim, Hans-Christian Hege, Stefan Zachow |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 30% |
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 23 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 22 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,319,745
of 23,051,185 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#32
of 860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,767
of 111,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,051,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 860 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.