| Title |
Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-002-8938-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G.F. Dakin, M. Gagner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 20% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,407,363
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#460
of 6,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,897
of 49,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.