↓ Skip to main content

Tracing the history of submarine hydrothermal inputs and the significance of hydrothermal hafnium for the seawater budget—a combined Pb–Hf–Nd isotope approach

Overview of attention for article published in Earth & Planetary Science Letters, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tracing the history of submarine hydrothermal inputs and the significance of hydrothermal hafnium for the seawater budget—a combined Pb–Hf–Nd isotope approach
Published in
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, May 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.02.025
Authors

Tina van de Flierdt, Martin Frank, Alex N Halliday, James R Hein, Bodo Hattendorf, Detlef Günther, Peter W Kubik

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
France 1 1%
Jamaica 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
China 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 69 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 44 58%
Environmental Science 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Chemistry 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#2,318
of 5,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,973
of 62,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.