↓ Skip to main content

On insect attractants from pitcher plants of the genusHeliamphora (sarraceniaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, March 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
On insect attractants from pitcher plants of the genusHeliamphora (sarraceniaceae)
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, March 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf02036725
Pubmed ID
Authors

Klaus Jaffé, Murray S. Blum, Henry M. Fales, Robert T. Mason, Aivlé Cabrera

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Brazil 1 3%
Malaysia 1 3%
Nigeria 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 31 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Master 6 16%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 51%
Environmental Science 5 14%
Chemistry 4 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#719
of 2,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,762
of 23,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.