↓ Skip to main content

Platelet-derived growth factor promotes smooth muscle migration and intimal thickening in a rat model of balloon angioplasty.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Investigation, February 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
624 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Platelet-derived growth factor promotes smooth muscle migration and intimal thickening in a rat model of balloon angioplasty.
Published in
Journal of Clinical Investigation, February 1992
DOI 10.1172/jci115613
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Jawien, D F Bowen-Pope, V Lindner, S M Schwartz, A W Clowes

Abstract

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is a mitogen and chemoattractant for vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC) in vitro, but its activities in vivo remain largely undefined. We infused recombinant PDGF-BB (0.01-0.30 mg/kg per d i.v.) into rats subjected to carotid injury. PDGF-BB produced a small increase (two- to threefold) in medial SMC proliferation. More importantly, PDGF-BB greatly increased (20-fold) the intimal thickening and the migration of SMC from the media to the intima during the first 7 d after injury. These data provide support for the hypothesis that PDGF, and perhaps other platelet factors, might play an important role in the movement of mesenchymal cells into zones of injury undergoing repair.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Pakistan 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 87 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 19%
Engineering 11 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2014.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#6,698
of 17,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,743
of 61,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#9
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.