| Title |
An efficient protocol for genetic transformation of watercress (Nasturtium officinale) using Agrobacterium rhizogenes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Biology Reports, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11033-010-0638-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nam Il Park, Jae Kwang Kim, Woo Tae Park, Jin Woong Cho, Yong Pyo Lim, Sang Un Park |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 42% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology Reports
#400
of 2,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,637
of 181,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology Reports
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,960 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.