You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long-Term Outcomes with Drug-Eluting Stents versus Bare-Metal Stents in Sweden
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa067722 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bo Lagerqvist, Stefan K. James, Ulf Stenestrand, Johan Lindbäck, Tage Nilsson, Lars Wallentin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 224 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 64 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 38% |
| Engineering | 33 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 75 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#741,939
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#8,167
of 32,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,660
of 171,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#17
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.