↓ Skip to main content

Mimicry of Host Cuticular Hydrocarbons by Salticid Spider Cosmophasis bitaeniata That Preys on Larvae of Tree Ants Oecophylla smaragdina

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Mimicry of Host Cuticular Hydrocarbons by Salticid Spider Cosmophasis bitaeniata That Preys on Larvae of Tree Ants Oecophylla smaragdina
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, April 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1015249012493
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel A. Allan, Robert J. Capon, W. Vance Brown, Mark A. Elgar

Abstract

The salticid spider Cosmophasis bitaeniata preys on the larvae of the green tree ant Oecophylla smaragdina. Gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) reveal that the cuticle of C. bitaeniata mimics the mono- and dimethylalkanes of the cuticle of its prey. Recognition bioassays with extracts of the cuticular hydrocarbons of ants and spiders revealed that foraging major workers did not respond aggressively to the extracts of the spiders or conspecific nestmates, but reacted aggressively to conspecific nonnestmates. Typically, the ants either failed to react (as with control treatments with no extracts) or they reacted nonaggressively as with conspecific nestmates. These data indicate that the qualitative chemical mimicry of ants by C. bitaeniata allows the spiders to avoid detection by major workers of O. smaragdina.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Benin 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 109 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 25%
Student > Master 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 63%
Environmental Science 9 8%
Unspecified 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 25 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#579
of 2,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,019
of 128,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.