| Title |
The role of peroxisomes in aging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, July 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s000180050192 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Périchon, J. M. Bourre, J. F. Kelly, G. S. Roth |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 24% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,640,433
of 24,614,554 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#656
of 5,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,474
of 34,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,614,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.