↓ Skip to main content

Glass buildings on river banks as “polarized light traps” for mass-swarming polarotactic caddis flies

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Glass buildings on river banks as “polarized light traps” for mass-swarming polarotactic caddis flies
Published in
The Science of Nature, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00114-008-0345-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

György Kriska, Péter Malik, Ildikó Szivák, Gábor Horváth

Abstract

The caddis flies Hydropsyche pellucidula emerge at dusk from the river Danube and swarm around trees and bushes on the river bank. We document here that these aquatic insects can also be attracted en masse to the vertical glass surfaces of buildings on the river bank. The individuals lured to dark, vertical glass panes land, copulate, and remain on the glass for hours. Many of them are trapped by the partly open, tiltable windows. In laboratory choice experiments, we showed that ovipositing H. pellucidula are attracted to highly and horizontally polarized light stimulating their ventral eye region and, thus, have positive polarotaxis. In the field, we documented that highly polarizing vertical black glass surfaces are significantly more attractive to both female and male H. pellucidula than weakly polarizing white ones. Using video polarimetry, we measured the reflection-polarization characteristics of vertical glass surfaces of buildings where caddis flies swarmed. We propose that after its emergence from the river, H. pellucidula is attracted to buildings by their dark silhouettes and the glass-reflected, horizontally polarized light. After sunset, this attraction may be strengthened by positive phototaxis elicited by the buildings' lights. The novelty of this visual-ecological phenomenon is that the attraction of caddis flies to vertical glass surfaces has not been expected because vertical glass panes do not resemble the horizontal surface of waters from which these insects emerge and to which they must return to oviposit.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Hungary 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 60 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 50%
Environmental Science 8 13%
Design 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,228,510
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#178
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,944
of 160,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them