↓ Skip to main content

Novel antidepressant effects of Paeonol alleviate neuronal injury with concomitant alterations in BDNF, Rac1 and RhoA levels in chronic unpredictable mild stress rats

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Novel antidepressant effects of Paeonol alleviate neuronal injury with concomitant alterations in BDNF, Rac1 and RhoA levels in chronic unpredictable mild stress rats
Published in
Psychopharmacology, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00213-018-4915-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiu-Ling Zhu, Jing-Jing Chen, Fei Han, Chuan Pan, Ting-Ting Zhuang, Ya-Fei Cai, Ya-Ping Lu

Abstract

Increasing evidence has suggested that major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly associated with brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels, dendrites atrophy, and loss of dendritic spines, especially in emotion-associated brain regions including the hippocampus. Paeonol is a kind of polyphenols natural product with a variety of therapeutic effects. Recent studies have reported its antidepressant effects. However, it is unclear what signaling pathways contribute to improve MDD. The present study investigated the effect of Paeonol on hippocampal neuronal morphology and its possible signaling pathways in chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) rat model. Using CUMS rat model, the antidepressant-like effect of Paeonol was validated via depression-related behavioral tests. Neuronal morphology in hippocampal CA1 and DG was assessed using ImageJ's Sholl plugin and RESCONSTRUCT software. BDNF signaling pathway-related molecules was determined by Western blotting. Paeonol attenuated CUMS-induced depression-like behaviors, which were accompanied by hippocampal neuronal morphological alterations. After Paeonol treatment for 4 weeks, the dendritic length and complexity and the density of dendritic spines markedly increased in the hippocampal CA1 and the dentate gyrus (DG). However, CUMS or Paeonol treatment does not selectively affect dendritic spine types. Simultaneously, administration of Paeonol deterred CUMS-induced cofilin1 activation that is essential for remolding of dendritic spines. The induction of CUMS downregulated BDNF levels and upregulated Rac1/RhoA levels; however, the tendency of these was inhibited by treatment with Paeonol. Our data suggest that BDNF-Rac1/RhoA pathway may be involved in attenuation of CUMS-induced behavioral and neuronal damage by Paeonol that may represent a novel therapeutic agent for depression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 12 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 13 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,609,054
of 23,051,185 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#4,657
of 5,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,121
of 325,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#23
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,051,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.