↓ Skip to main content

Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, May 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1408 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1652 Mendeley
Title
Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity
Published in
Oecologia, May 1997
DOI 10.1007/s004420050180
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael A. Huston

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,652 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 44 3%
Brazil 23 1%
Germany 13 <1%
Canada 13 <1%
France 12 <1%
Argentina 11 <1%
South Africa 5 <1%
Australia 5 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Other 40 2%
Unknown 1482 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 358 22%
Researcher 311 19%
Student > Master 257 16%
Student > Bachelor 132 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 104 6%
Other 318 19%
Unknown 172 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 846 51%
Environmental Science 446 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 45 3%
Engineering 20 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 <1%
Other 54 3%
Unknown 229 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,108,032
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#275
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#870
of 29,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.