| Title |
Supercapacitor devices using porous silicon electrodes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ionics, January 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02375918 |
| Authors |
S. E. Rowlands, R. J. Latham, W. S. Schlindwein |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 40% |
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 9 | 23% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 20% |
| Engineering | 6 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,764,724
of 23,051,185 outputs
Outputs from Ionics
#16
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,107
of 99,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ionics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,051,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them