| Title |
Predicting crack propagation with peridynamics: a comparative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Fracture, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10704-011-9628-4 |
| Authors |
Abigail Agwai, Ibrahim Guven, Erdogan Madenci |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 27% |
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 93 | 59% |
| Materials Science | 11 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 46 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,063,370
of 24,032,151 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Fracture
#12
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,909
of 135,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Fracture
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,032,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them