| Title |
Review of chemical constituents of the red algaPalmaria palmata (dulse)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, January 1980
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02859553 |
| Authors |
Keith C. Morgan, Jeffrey L. C. Wright, F. J. Simpson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 20% |
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 40 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 35% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2003.
All research outputs
#4,764,724
of 23,051,185 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#142
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,744
of 28,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,051,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them